Spende 15. September, 2024 – 1. Oktober, 2024 Über Spenden

Theism and Atheism: Opposing Arguments in Philosophy

Theism and Atheism: Opposing Arguments in Philosophy

Joseph W. Koterski, Graham Oppy
Wie gefällt Ihnen dieses Buch?
Wie ist die Qualität der Datei?
Herunterladen Sie das Buch, um Ihre Qualität zu bewerten
Wie ist die Qualität der heruntergeladenen Dateien?
Theism and Atheism: Opposing Arguments in Philosophy is a peer-reviewed, academic volume that has two separate editors in chief, with their respective editorial boards. The atheism side is led by Graham Oppy (Australian philosopher, Monash University). The theism side is led by Joseph Koterski, S.J. (American philosopher, Fordham University) and includes Christian, Jewish, and Muslim philosophers.

The two editorial boards worked together to identify twenty key topics in philosophical debates regarding arguments for and against the existence of God (e.g., Religious Experience, Miracles, Our Universe, Human Beings, Science, Religious Diversity, etc.). The single volume is composed of forty total chapters. The format is such that an author taking the side of theism composes a chapter on a topic, followed by an atheism author covering the same topic (e.g., "Miracles: Theism" followed by "Miracles: Atheism").

The title presents complex philosophical counter perspectives in a lucid manner. It grapples with issues that have occupied philosophers for more than two millennia. These include the sufficiency/insufficiency of an empirical explanation for the existence of the universe; the capacity/incapacity of the empirical sciences to draw conclusions about a possible infinite being; the validity/invalidity of philosophical arguments regarding the existence of an infinite being; various notions of infinity; the "problem of evil," and so on.

Jahr:
2019
Verlag:
Macmillan Reference USA
Sprache:
english
Seiten:
718
ISBN 10:
0028664450
ISBN 13:
9780028664453
Datei:
PDF, 5.78 MB
IPFS:
CID , CID Blake2b
english, 2019
Online lesen
Die Konvertierung in ist im Gange
Die Konvertierung in ist fehlgeschlagen

Am meisten angefragte Begriffe